Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
morganew

Stanley 45 and 55, can I make a 55 work like a 45?

6 posts in this topic

I currently have a perfect untouched Stanley 45, still in its wooden box; all cutters, things still in unopened paper wrappers, etc. Someone gave it to me without realizing what it was, and the kind of shape it was in.

I was ALSO given a worn Stanley 55, with a tupperware container of cutters, a slightly bent depth stop, missing the slitter, a skate that seems not quite coplanar with its mate, but otherwise solid.

I am not a tool collector - I figure tools were meant to be used. That said it seems a shame to break out the 45 and put it into circulation when I have a well worn 55.

I've used the 45s at Roy Underhill's school in NC, and found them pretty workable for doing drawer bottom dadoes and the like.

That said, I've read that the 55 is more finicky than the 45, and harder to get dialed in.

Visually, the 55 seems like I could strip it down to be a 45, and not worry about all the gee gaws that come with it. If that's true, it makes sense to keep the 45 in the box, and either sell it or give it to someone for whom collecting is the real value of woodworking tools.

Anyone here have experience with both? Can I effectively downgrade the 55?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't think of any reason why not. The #55 is really just a tricked up #45. So if all you want to do is to use the same features you can do so.

Screwing up in new ways every day :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't touch that 45 in the condition it is.

You should be able to use the 55 just fine, but if you can't go out to an auction or ebay and buy another 45 to use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Muddleheaded WW: Agree on the face of it, however there are some slight differences between the two. Unfortunately Patrick's Blood and Gore is less than helpful on these two - he openly admits to hating both with a red-hot passion. To wit, here's his opening paragraph on the Stanley #55:

The Great Zeus Himself thought His sentence of Prometheus to be the ultimate punishment for mankind, and throughout the millenia it was. That is, until the year 1897 when Messrs. Justus Traut and Edmund Schade devised a torture that knew no bounds betwixt Gods and mortals. We should all be so lucky to be chained to a rock and have our livers eaten daily by an organ-hungry raptor than to suffer the agony of this contraption. Even the Chinese would have gladly abandoned their infamous drip, drip, drip of water to the forehead had they been on Stanley's favored nations tradelist. If there can be a ball and chain of planes, this is it, baby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TimV

Yeah, that's the other possibility. buy a beater 45 and set it up to just do dadoes. But if that's all, then I might as well check out the Veritas...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have a Stanley #45 from 1910 and bought another #45 for the parts I did not have. From the research I have done on the internet and a couple of Stanley books that I have the #55 can use all of the irons from a #45, but a #45 cannot use some of the irons from a #55. I am not sure why this is. Some of the mint condition and complete #45's on Ebay at the time I bought mine were going for at least a couple of hundred dollars, and I have had mine for about a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have a friend that built a 10' x 28" long Roubo.  5" thick European beech.  No sag.  It makes my Roubo look like a toy.  I think you will want to beef up the leg dimensions, but that's mainly for aesthetics. At 4' wide you are at 2 Roubo width. Just build 2, and only put vises on one side. Later in life, you can sell one and move the other into your home shop. 
    • OK, That looks similar to mine after 3 coats. and the c hange in color with the oil confirms what my ample board told me.  I am going to use flat water base poly (2 coats) because I need a little more protection for the wood.  I will let you know how it turns out.  Thanks for the response.    It might be interesting to make my own since the little bags a woodcraft are pricey.
    • It's about time. I'm surprised it took so long.
    • Applying poly as topcoat on BLO is not uncommon but I have not done it on top of milk paint. As far milk paint goes, part of the attraction of it is the fact that it is "uneven", unlike latex paint.  I ended up appreciating the variations in the color of the milk paint.  The part that appealed the most to me was that you can see and feel the texture of the wood despite the milk paint.  I am posting a couple pics of my workbench that I painted with blue milk paint.  Don't get discouraged.  Just go through the proper steps, let the end product sit for a while and I am going to guess the you will come to appreciated it, like I did. Here is the milk paint after it was sanded to 220: Here is the end product after 2 coats of Danish oil: Closer view of the panels, and I think the panel below has had only one coat of Danish oil. Moral of the story: If I can make milk paint work, anyone can!
    • I had some plumbing done 5 years ago - 2 toilets back to back,  The plumber said that the vent connection to the toilet drain lines needed to be above the level where the toilet drains into the main stack.  Where are your vent(s)?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Who's Chatting

    There are no users currently in the chat room