jgt1942

Members
  • Content Count

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

22 Neutral

About jgt1942

  • Rank
    Apprentice Poster

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Oak Island, NC USA
  • Woodworking Interests
    general woodworking and woodturning

Recent Profile Visitors

493 profile views
  1. For the past several days I've made very little progress because I could not understand what happened to the seat back joints. Initially I could not understand why the red arrow areas where so large and why they were not equal. I went in huge circles trying to determine what the heck I did wrong. Finally I notice that the rabbit joints (the green arrow areas) were NOT 0.25" nor where they equal. I spent a few more days trying to determine what did I do wrong. Tossing and turning in bed one night it hit me ..... DUH ...... I had cut the rabbits after I had glued up the seat. Perhaps you remember in an earlier post I stated that I had goofed and glued the seat together too early. Well this introduced this issues. Due to the curvature of the seat it was not possible for the router to set flat on the seat boards and correctly cut the rabbit joints. I pulled out my carving tools and patiently worked on the joints. Then I used a block and 120 grit sand paper to ensure everything was level. Following is the results. Now both the left/right joints matched. Finally I could move to the next step. Because I'm using the negative/positive degree router bits I had to make a jig that would cut the angles in the back legs. BTW I will be using instructions from Hal Taylor for the official build, I understand he does NOT use the neg/pos 5 degree bits. Recently I received his PDF instructions and have not really looked at them. I'm sorta torn between finishing this test build or just jumping in and moving forward with his instructions. I'm leaning toward moving forward with Hal's instructions. However I have two major projects that I really need to get started on, both have hard deadlines and I cannot afford to miss the deadlines. Here is the 5 degree jig I made. Note that I made lots of notes on the jig, hopefully this will ensure I do everything correctly. The board at the far bottom (you can just see the edge) is attached to the base. Its main purpose is just to give me more space between the jig and me. I don't like the idea of a spinning blade and my hand meeting. The base has two miter attachments and ride in the miter slots in the table saw. A few months ago I re-tuned my tablesaw and ensured that the blade was correct positioned to give me 90 degree cuts. I used the five-cut method to ensure all was accurate. The board with the pink highlighted area is attached to the base and just serves as a stop for the movable pieces. The left side of the highlighted area is in alignment with the left side of the tablesaw blade. In the image I have my dado setup. The height of the dado blade is 0.25" above the base of the jig. I firmly positioned the movable piece of the jig and leg against the fixed piece. Aligned everything for the cut and made the 5 degree cut. It would have been best to attach a couple of clamps to hold the movable pieces. There are two reasons this piece is movable (1) I flip it over to make the cut for the other leg (2) I use the same base for the 90 degree cut. In the following I'm standing on the outfeed side of the tablesaw. I wanted to show the alignment of the leg against the jig and the position of the leg at the point the blade will pass through and make the cut in the leg. The reference lines (the pink highlighted area) are NOT used for this alignment because the two cuts (the 5 degree and 90 degree) must correctly meet. I'm happy with the alignment but would have been happier if it had been a bit better. I don't know why but I think most of the issues were me and not the fault of Scott and his instructions. I had goofed by glueing up the seat too early, this introduced a major issue for me and I just had a lot of issues doing the 5 degree cuts.
  2. Not only the head rest, which is a series of board similar to the seat where he runs the grain up/down (six blocks from 4 to 5 inches wide (4” for a small chair and ~4 & 3/4” for a large) by seven to eight inches long (depending on what your band saw will cut). This provides a contiguous width of 24 to 30 inches which is sufficient width for most chairs.) Also, his spindles are flexible I think he makes all of his seat flat rather than rounded. I personally like the rounded look. Marc Spagnuolo always does a great job. I failed to look at his build and did not know he had done so until you mentioned it. Looks like he also has a flat bottom seat.
  3. Ok I think I've determine how to avoid the mistakes I made, I'm assuming that I did and Scott's instructions could be improved. I may be overly anel and this is not really necessary. I will document the procedure if I use the current plans for the real build. The Hal Taylor plans should be here today or tomorrow, they are super detail but still may have somethings that confuse me. OH well, sometimes life is confusing and sometimes it is fun trying to discover how to correct your mistakes.
  4. After reading your post I measured using my template where I had accidently cut the notches out. Now that I encountered this issue I can make a couple of reference lines on the template and use them to ensure I have the placement of the template on future seats positioned correctly. I will just add a piece of wood to the inside portion of the leg and joint pad area between 1/4" and 1/3". Then I can easily trim away any extra. Or just flush the leg to the joint, measure the gap for the raggit, that will determine how much wood I need to add (it should be 1/4"). I did notice in Scotts DVD I think he made another goof when describing how to ensure the joint area was properly cut. I followed his instructions and cut an extra 1/8" off, thus I'll need another piece of wood glued onto the leg.
  5. I did not scale the 1/4" for the rabbit just because I did not have a bearing that would produce that size. When I cut my seat template to the 71% scale I did cut the notch out on the template, this was a goof on my part but I just checked it against the leg and I think the joint would be a very close fit. When Scott discusses the back joint I think that it might be just luck when it comes out correctly. He uses the outer edge of boards 1 & 5 as measurement reference points. He says something similar to this: Now let’s layout the position of the back leg. From the outside edge measure and mark 2 7/8” for 100% scale, (2.04” for 71% scale). (I added the 71% numbers). He makes a mark at the 2 7/8" measurement. "From the back edge, place the square on the 2 7/8” mark for 100% scale, (2.13” for 71% scale) mark, draw a line down to the 3” point on the ruler for 100% scale, (2.13” for 71% scale) mark on the square." and he is making his measurement as in the following image. At the end of the 3” mark for 100% scale, (2.13” for 71% scale) mark draw a line to the outside edge The then states he has the cutout area for the back leg IMHO if you positioned the template on the boards incorrectly this measurement will be off. No where does he discuss any alignment for the template. As I stated above, when I made the template, I cut out the back notch areas. However I think they can be used for more accurate placement of the leg joint. I did notice on the plans that the left/right back joints were not mirror images of each other. I need to correct this goof (this was Scotts goof). At this time I'm just going to glue a piece of wood to each leg and move forward. I need to think about how I want to correct Scotts directions so when I do my build with good wood I will not have this issue. Another note I may completely follow Hal Taylor's instructions. Hal ships a paper copy of the template. The first thing I will do with the paper copy is to take it to a drafting shop and have them scan it at full size. This will ensure I have a copy. Hal cuts a lot of his chair on a CNC machine but he does not sell the CNC files.
  6. I've gone through all of the measurements, including the scale, a few times and so far I have not found where I goofed. Possibly one of the issues is the way Scott makes his measurements and the way my mind works or does not work. I'm going to cut a new board for board 5 of the seat, as you face the seat from the front this would be the right-most board, and follow Scotts' directions and ensure I did the scale reduction correct. Scott starts with 2" thick boards, at 71% this would be 1.42" He then cuts all stock to rough measurements (I added an extra inch) He then planes all the cut pieces to 1.75", at 71% this would be 1.24" thus the leg "should" be 1.24" thick. I checked my leg board and it is 1.3" thick. I then checked the back leg cuts without measuring the 1/4" cut I can see that something is off and it is NOT going to work. For it to work with the current board thickness A would have to be a max of 0.95" (this would allow for the 1/4" lip made by the router) and B would have to be a max of 1.45" (this would allow for the 1/4" lip). Now for the hard part, I got to think!!! OH GEE WHIZ! I can resolve the current issue by adding 1/4"+ to the inside of the leg and 1/4" to the front joint area of the leg and then just taper everything so it looks natural. However if this was the official build with some really good wood it might look bad, for sure it would be different. Bmac, I just looked at your post regarding the notches in the seat and don't understand how you made the measurements, possibly I just missed that section. The way Scott makes the measurements starts with a rectangular boards, e.g. boards 1 and 5 cut to "the" length. He either measures from the outside edge or the front/back of the edge. After you trim the seat you loose the reference point for the measurements. If I had deducted a 1/2" to account for the lip I would have been MUCH closer or exactly at what I needed. Perhaps that is what I should have done. I just checked my front leg joint cuts and all looks OK here (or I think it is OK). Obviously I made some error on the back.
  7. OK I've hit a small snag with my build. I just finished the back legs and clamped it in place. I have NOT cut the key section in the leg that will fit into the seat. It seems that the leg should be about 1/4" thicker on two sides. Obviously I can make another leg easy enough or just glue some wood in that area or customize the edge of the seat in that area so it will be flush with the leg. GEE decisions, decisions!! Possibly I made a mistake when I rescaled to 71% of original size. Looking at the first image below, if I cut the key in the current leg, it will slide forward 1/4" and to the left 1/4".
  8. Current plan is to finish the build. I'm thinking of making the rockers out of Oak from pallets. If it turns out good then one of the girls can have it or I will give it to our local library or a hospital where they have a kids section.
  9. Yes I am! When I started the build I watched the DVD about the portion of the build I was doing. Sometimes I had to watch a section numerous times to get everything or some fine detail that I missed. I take screen with SnagIt and then add my notes, everything is in a Word document (I'm a PC user). Currently I'm on page 24 of my build and I just made it to the back legs. Scott builds the chair a bit differently with respect to the sequence of things. First is board selection, then making the templates, then cuts all the boards to rough length, then mrks the boards with the templates (I reduced the size to 71% because this will be for a 3 year old and a 2 year old set of girls). He then makes the seat, (cuts 3 degree angle, inserts dowels (I used Dominos) makes the leg joints in the seat, rounds over the bottom edge of the seat. Now he glues the seat together and then grinds it out, This is followed by cutting out the rear legs. This is as far as I have gotten. I'm slow and old! At various points I've had problems with following his directions, some were because of me and some I think he left something out. When I finish I should have a very good set of notes that I will call draft one. When I start the actual build I will use the notes and make more enhancements. BTW I've also ordered a set of plans and instructions from Hal Taylor. He and I have been exchanging emails. Hal has a LOT more detail and of course does it differently. I'm waiting for the delivery and may just use is plans for the real build. Hal suggest NOT building with scrap wood, he suggest jumping into the project with the final product wood. To some extent I agree, this is a big build and I will invest a LOT of time. I have not been keeping track of the time and my current estimate is 3 times what Bmac spent on his build but he has a lot more experience with the build than I do. If you are considering ordering from Hal, make sure you order directly from him using http://www.rockingchairuniversity.com/store/c3/Rocking_Chair_University.html I had a very difficult time finding this URL (could be just me).
  10. Part of my problem with splay of the legs I kept thinking they splayed out but the splay in. Now it makes a lot more sense! I have made progress but it has been super slow. I've watch and rewatch Scott's video (in section) numerous times. As a newbie to the build sometimes I either miss something critical or he seems to skip over it thus I will rewatch some sections of the video numerous times and make my notes. Also the scaling the chair down to 71% has presented some issue which are mostly my fault. Sometimes I'm accidently referencing the full scale drawing when I should be referencing the 71% scale. Dummy mistake because I have clearly marked the drawings. I've also been looking at what Hal Taylor does in his builds. I had a super hard time finding stuff on his website, especially to buy his plans or videos. I did send him an email but never received a reply. Back to the chair, as I previously said I'm building my first Maloof style chair and following Scott Morrison's DVD. At this time I have finished the seat and ready to start the back legs (per his DVD). Remember that this is a test build for me and I'm using 2x4s that I picked up from job sites. I've had a few challenges as previously noted but the build is coming out much better than I had expected. Therefore I'm looking forward to the next steps. I'm trying NOT to cut any corners and pretending this is really good wood.. Following are images of the seat, the top side followed by the bottom side.
  11. Bmac ref your Oct 22 post "Cut the back notches for the rear leg joints. A few thoughts here, first the size of the notch is only somewhat important. I try to be dead on but as you'll see with assembly there is extra seat here extending out past the rear leg. So if you cut the notch at 2 15/16ths" instead of 3", you'll be fine. The real big deal is the fact that this notch needs to be dead on square, I mean dead on. " I noticed that Hal Taylor does square cuts, I really like how he does the back slats. Scott Morrison cuts a negative and positive 5 degree cut on the back joint on the side that runs from the back toward the front of the seat. I see that you just make it square. Other than not have to deal with the +/- cuts what do I gain or loose. I noticed that Hal Taylor also uses a square cut (I have not watch his DVD or read through his document). I've been watching Scott's DVD and he states that you want the legs to splay out but as I see his setup for the cut, it seems to me that it is backwards. He set the fence 85 degrees to the blade. places the top toward the blade and makes a cut on board 1.
  12. OK I finally realized that the drawing for the "plans" are not exact and are for reference, they are close but not exact. I'm following Scott Morrison's DVD and plans. This and the issue I introduced was driving me nuts (short drive) I will be making two chairs for very young girls (under the age of 3) thus I needed to reduce the scale. I determined that 75% of original would be a good size so I reduced the plans to 75% or so I thought, it's an old age thing. So when following Scott's video my 75% measurements were not coming out as I expected. When I disco vered the error and adjusted the measurements for 71% it was like magic, the measurements were correct (amazing!). The red arrows identify the three cut lines, the small black arrows identify the tablesaw blade side of the line.
  13. LOL when you get older you ask the question about more rooms, like the bathroom or bedroom or kitchen.....
  14. I've done this on a few things but often I'm going to turn something that I'm gluing up and anytype of metal does present a problem. Thus I seldom use the nail idea and most often forget to use it when I can. Old age has made me forgetful. Every walk in to a room and you ask yourself, "Why did I come into this room"? The nail idea would work for the seat alignment, sure is a LOT easier than the domino or dowels. When grinding out the seat if you hit a domino or dowel you just won the big goof badge, if you hit the nail it is time to stop grinding and most likely you should still get the big goof badge.
  15. I personally think that either using dowels or dominos best helps with the alignment and holds the boards in place when you apply the clamps for the glue to set-up. In the past when I glued boards without anything to hold them in place it was super difficult to keep them aligned when the clamps were applied. When I started using the DF500 the first thing I noticed is that the boards were perfectly aligned. Now that I've glued up the seat (I should have waited and done this after doing some other steps first) I realize I could have used the side-stop extension on the front dominos and achieved a more accurate alignment. When I build with good wood I will use them for the front, this is where I will use the smallest width that the DF500 will cut. In the back I will use a marker line on either the top or bottom and use the middle setting for the DF500. The front dominos will correctly position the boards front-to-back and up-down as well. The back dominos will correctly position the boards up-down, the front-to-back will be loose. If you cut the back domino slots with the DF500 narrowest setting it would require that the slots be 100% accurate. That would require the boards to be exact equal lengths and the position of the DF500 to be exactly on the lines. It is possible but highly unlikely that you could achieve this. I agree that you could use "custom" cauls (you need cauls to fit the shape of the slope, also at the time you are gluing up the seat the slopes on the boards have very rough cut on the top side) to get perfect alignment, however close might be good enough for the up/down position. I have the Scott Morrison DVDs, when he marks for the joints on the seat he uses the front and side edge of the board 5 as his reference point for measurements. He then sets his stops on the tablesaw based on these measurements and cuts both #1 & #2 boards. If the boards are not the exact same lengths the joints will NOT be correctly aligned. This will throw off the position of the legs. I'm not sure how critical the actual position of the legs are but they would be different. Scott measuring from the front edge of the board to determine the front edge of the front joint. Scott measuring from the back edge to determine the position of the front-to-back line of the joint. Using the mark just made Scott draws the front-to-back line of the back joint and marks the position of the front of the joint. Scott draws a line to mark the front of the back joint.