Flooring Question Of Opinion

[Chestnut]

I've realized there is no right answer to this question so I'm going to ask people's opinions.

Background: What i have is a house that was built in the 1920s. There are at least 3 different construction styles, which makes the house really interesting but also complicates things. Nothing on the house is historic nor original, I don't care much about keeping things original but more want to finish renovations quickly and cost effectively.
The Maple hardwood flooring under the carpet was in a non-repairable state. It had been sanded near to the T&G in the high traffic main walk ways as well as had huge chips gouges  and broken boards. In the bed rooms that saw less traffic things are different. The flooring looks able to be refinished. I replaced the 2 living rooms with oak flooring

Question: So i remove the Old maple flooring and install flooring matching the rest of the house, or should i refinish the bedroom floor and say to hell with matching?

[wtnhighlander]

IMO, just refinish.

[Brian Endres]

I think it would depend on my budget and how much work I was willing to put into the project, but my personal opinion is. I like the look of the grain and width of the oak planks. Two of the properties I own both have the original 1950's oak flooring which I was very happy to find under the grungy carpet

[Chestnut]

My main concern with refinishing is that the maple is only 3/8" thick total with maybe 3/16" for the top. Is sanding through going to be a concern?

[Brendon_t]

Different flooring together bugs me, but that's a me thing.

[TerryMcK]

I wouldn't worry about it - although it may have been nicer had the boards run in the same direction. You only see the difference when you open the door and even then you can always put another carpet down.