Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking to build and assembly table along the lines of the torsion box that Mark S. has designed. It occurred to me that if I built this table a few inches larger than 4'x8', I would be able to store full sheets of plywood horizontally below the work surface.

The table would use kick-up casters like Norm's design: http://www.newyankee.com/getproduct.php?0207

Has anyone else tried such a thing? Dumb idea?

Posted

Haven't tried it and no, I don't think it's necessarily a dumb idea. Sheet goods are a pig to store no matter what you do with them. Some things do jump to mind, though:

  • Where will you get the sheet materials to make a top that is bigger than standard sheet materials?
  • 4' across is already a sizable span. If you're building really big stuff and will end up climbing up onto the table, rock on. Otherwise, you may find yourself reaching and leaning in an effort to get into the center of the table.

Good luck.

Posted

how about this make two table that when pushed together cover a bunch of sheet goods. if you decide it is not usefull then you have two tables that can be for assembly or feed tables. think this might be usefull if you dont do alot of work with sheet goods.

  • Like 1
Posted

I like the general idea. However if the table is loaded with sheet goods will it be to heavy to activate the casters?

I have built lumber storage under my 9 x 16 deck outside. On one part is my sheet goods storage.

Posted

How would you accommodate the legs? At least on one side you would have to move the legs outward to fit the sheet goods in. Would you have enough room in your shop to have the table in place and be able to pull the sheet out? The size of the top is not the big issue. A 4X8 sheet with a skirt around it or breadboard would increase the size. Would this be practical versus a wall rack?

Posted

Not a bad idea, if you have space for a 4x8 (or bigger) assembly table. If you do - consider me green with envy :)

I guess I would be concerned about the sheer size of it. Working on an item, reaching to the middle of it, or having to walk around it....seems like it might be less than optimal. You could easily try this out - on your next project, put a 4x8 sheet on some sawhorses (use 2x4's across them for support) and use that for your assembly table. See how that works for you.

The weight might also be an issue....it wouldn't take a lot of sheet goods to become very very heavy.

Posted

My only concern would be needing the sheet at the bottom of the pile and having to shuffle 10 sheets to get to it. Unless height is an issue, vertical storage makes sorting a whole lot easier.

Posted

Hey Danny,

I"am thinking of doing the same thing, check out Jon Rael's table. You can find at Fine Woodworking.com workshop tab, then shop gallery. I like his design check it out!!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 295 Guests (See full list)

  • Forum Statistics

    31.9k
    Total Topics
    433.6k
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    25,852
    Total Members
    3,644
    Most Online
    Geanexrry
    Newest Member
    Geanexrry
    Joined