How is this tablesaw?


Jtblckmaro

Recommended Posts

The owner comments I've seen have been mostly positive, with a mix of not so happy campers. On the plus side, it's a full size cast iron saw with an inboard belt drive induction motor, with plenty of space, heft, and power for the majority of tasks, and it has a one-piece cast arbor carriage with a blade shroud. It's a nice step up from most benchtop saws, jobsite saws, and compact saws. On the negative side, it's not 3hp as claimed...it's a 15 amp 1-1/2hp motor much like most others in the contractor saw/hybrid class, it has steel wings, an average fence, and somewhat thin sheet metal all around. Once tuned up and fitted with a good blade, it should be capable of good work. If the price is right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got it at Lowe's on clearance. It was $285 out the door after a little problem at the service desk.

Took my time putting it together. Sometimes it sucks being a perfectionist, cuz damn all I wanted to do was start cutting!

Aside from my long nights at work, it took about 2 and a half hours of work over a 3 day period to get it set up.

Took a little muscle from my dead-blow to get the extension tables and fence rails level to the table, but overall it was a piece of cake to set up.

Got ahead of myself and started sending a sheet of ply through without checking the fence for square. Ended up being about 1/16 off over the length of the fence but that was an easy adjustment.

But oh my god what an improvement!

I can actually carry on a conversation while the saw is running!

I can run nice size boards through without doing a balancing act!

And it only took like 15 minutes to make a zero clearance insert unlike my POS ryobi that took an hour and a half to rig up!

All in all there's one happy little squid over here! :D

Ok, thanks guys, i'm done jabbering now :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very happy with my WWII blade. I'm very fortunate to also have a great sharpener locally. Contrary to what some people might say, you don't have to send the blade to Forest for sharpening. But you do have to use a top-notch sharpener. The mass production outfits likely won't do a WWII justice.

Now the big decision; thin kerf, or regular kerf? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any drawbacks to thin kerf?

I figure less waste, less blade wear (seems a thinner kerf will have less surface friction than a full kerf) and less heat build-up since there is less mass to retain the heat, plus a thinner blade might dissipate heat faster?

Any thoughts or tips on that would be appreciated.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any drawbacks to thin kerf?

I figure less waste, less blade wear (seems a thinner kerf will have less surface friction than a full kerf) and less heat build-up since there is less mass to retain the heat, plus a thinner blade might dissipate heat faster?

Any thoughts or tips on that would be appreciated.

Thanks

Thin kerf blades can flex a bit more than a comparably made full kerf blade, but that doesn't mean they will. It's not likely to be an issue with a modern high quality blade on a good saw...emphasis on good quality. The TK's pose less resistance to the saw, which allows it to cut thicker stock with less strain, which can extend the life of the motor. The better TK's from companies like Infinity, Forrest, Freud, CMT, Ridge Carbide, Tenryu, Amana, DeWalt, Ridgid Titanium, etc., are well made with proper tensioning and shouldn't cause flutter on their own. The full kerf blades actually handle heat better due to their increased mass, but heat shouldn't be an issue in a hobby setting with normal hobbyist type volumes. There are have been several blade articles in recent years discussing how the better TK blades cut equally well as a comparable full kerf blade...Wood, American Woodworker, Fine Woodworking, and Popular Woodworking all touched on the subject. I found thin kerf blades to be really beneficial on my smaller saws, and I've never experienced flexing or vibration from a good TK. A good TK blade on a well tuned saw with low vibration and low runout shouldn't need a stabilizer...I'd only put one on if there's a runout problem to address, but note that it's more a bandaid for the root cause than a real cure.

The Forrest is a great general purpose blade, but so is the Infinity Combomax 010-150, Ridge Carbide TS2000, Freud Fusion, and a few others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting point about heat, Knot :) I never used a stabilizer on my TK WWII blade on my previous saw (and never suffered from flexing), but I wonder if a stabilizer will give the mass to hold some of the heat much like a larger blade would? Is the stabilizer all metal and have a metal-to-metal contact with the blade? If so, it would likely help with the heat, though not as much as a full-kerf blade since the heat has to travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm

I assumed that since the blade was spinning so fast that enough air could get to it to bleed the heat out faster. Full kerf mass would hold the heat more, but less blade mass does not equal less heat retention huh?

Looks like I have some real research to do before I get a quality blade.

Thanks guys, and keep em coming!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The smaller/thinner mass both heats and cools faster, while the thicker kerf heats up and cools more slowly. The thicker mass of a full kerf is less likely to distort from the heat, which is one of the factors that makes them a better choice for high volume commercial use, where they're being used for long sessions without stopping. Hobbyists tend to make a cut or three of much shorter durations, which don't build up much heat, and allow time for cooling between passes...pretty much a non-issue for most of us.

Paul, I'd have to guess that the stabilizers would probably act more like a thicker kerf as far as heat dissipation goes, but I'm guessing. But they also reduce blade height capacity, and cost quite a bit for what they are...a mini blade body with no teeth. Since most decent saws and higher quality thin kerf blades don't really need them, I generally suggest not using stabilizers unless a vibration or runout problem presents itself. The odds are pretty good that you'll end up with some lunch money left in your pocket, which of course deprives the seller of lunch money, unless you apply that savings towards a better blade! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Runout at the blade is the basically amount of deviation from spinning perfectly true on the arbor. There are a few possible contribuitors to runout...flatness of the blade itself, deviations in the arbor hole, deviations in the arbor flange, deviations in the arbor shaft, and bearings and belts can come into play too. All saws have some runout...on a well behaved saw, the total runout will be neglible. If all is not well, runout can cause things like minor vibration or blade flutter that can sometimes be improved by adding blade stabilizers to dampen the vibration, but a stabilizer won't fix the root cause and won't fix bigger runout problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 65 Guests (See full list)

  • Forum Statistics

    31.2k
    Total Topics
    422.3k
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    23,779
    Total Members
    3,644
    Most Online
    walo47
    Newest Member
    walo47
    Joined