Plane back flattening diagnosis - Cant get the tip


HunterL

Recommended Posts

See photo, I've been working this plane blade back on my DMT 400 grit a LOT, I can't seem to touch the tip as you can see in the photo. Any advice? I feel that I'm applying even pressure, should i try the thin shim technique to "flatten" only that portion all the way at the tip? Thanks

IMG_1461.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that a new plane or a new blade? It looks like the ruler trick was already used on it. Or also maybe just bad sharpening. Based on the scratch patterns, you have a LOT of work to do if you want to fix that by flattening the whole back. I'd say using the ruler trick would work, or grinding a whole new bevel so that you essentially just remove that whole end of the blade back to where it seems flat.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd grind it back to beyond the area that isn't flat, being careful not to burn it.

Then primary bevel it back to the deg you want, secondairy bevel it, and depending on how you feel about the ruler trick, then do the ruler trick to remove the burr and get it sharp.

Don't give up and give us feedback on how it went!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep going. :)  I'd go to 8000 at least...you won't get a mirror finish at 5k.  8k is the sweet spot.  Anything beyond 8k I find superfluous in woodworking...IMO.  And there's a lot of "O" when it comes to sharpening.  I think frequency of honing is more important than getting into astronomically high grits.  Keep your 8k stone nearby and touch it up often.  I watched a Tommy Mac video recently and he'd touch up his bevel on an extra extra fine diamond stone after every pin that he chiseled on a set of dovetails.  He just kept it at his bench within arm's reach and gave it two or three swipes, removed the burr, back to work.  Eye opening.

I think grinding back the bevel was the right move, but keep in mind that on a plane blade you only need to flatten the last quarter or half inch of the back.  Anything beyond that is just a waste of time...that surface area has zero impact on anything.  Chisels are a different story because the backs are a reference surface.  But that's not the case with plane blades.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Eric. said:

  I watched a Tommy Mac video recently and he'd touch up his bevel on an extra extra fine diamond stone after every pin that he chiseled on a set of dovetails.  He just kept it at his bench within arm's reach and gave it two or three swipes, removed the burr, back to work.  Eye opening.

With a honing guide?  Or just freehand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Randy

Whether you get a true mirror finish on either the back or the bevel may depend, to some degree, on what stones you are using. With some stones, even water stones, the final finish is never really as shiny as one would expect a mirror finish to be. I can't really tell from the picture, but does the back look like it still has noticeable scratches or is there no noticeable scratch pattern. I'd agree that taking it to 8000 is a good idea. That seems to be the grit that is required for real sharp tools. I don't believe that going beyond that really improves the sharpness so that it makes it worth it to buy the extra stone. After using the 8000 grit and sharpening the bevel, etc. try it. If it gives you the kind of performance that you expect, it's probably right even if the final finish isn't a shiny mirrored one. Others may have other experiences, but that's mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Randy is right about some types of stones never giving a perfectly polished surface.

Without small steps between stone grit sizes, it takes Way too long for almost anyone to get all the scratches off of a back with any kind of stones.  What works okay for jumps between grits on a bevel doesn't take metal off of a back anywhere close to as fast as a bevel.  There is just too much surface area to be able to put the same pressure per square measure with fingers relative to the small surface area of a bevel.  It's really only necessary to get the surface close to the edge to the same level of finish as the bevel.  The cutting edge is a combination of the intersection of the back and bevel.  It doesn't work to have gaps from scratches on one side, but it only matters at the edge.  This is why the ruler trick works if you can't otherwise get the back, at the cutting edge, polished.

The investment in extra stones just isn't worth it for most hobbyists.  Three stone steps are plenty to get by with.  I did for decades only use three stones.

I first started filling in the gaps between stones specifically for doing backs, and found that the smaller steps made quicker work on bevels too, but I get to deduct what i spend on tools, so the payback is different for me than a little time saved in sharpening for the average woodworker.

I'm impressed that Tommy Mac has progressed beyond doing all the extra bevels on his chisels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 44 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Forum Statistics

    31.2k
    Total Topics
    422.5k
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    23,792
    Total Members
    3,644
    Most Online
    jolaode
    Newest Member
    jolaode
    Joined