Two photo frames


rodger.

Recommended Posts

I made these two simplistic frames as a gift for a friends youngest daughter.

I made one frame from cherry (with walnut splines) and the second from walnut with cherry splines to make a set. I used a mitre jig on my TS for the miters, and a buscuit joiner jig to cut the splines. The TS jig ensure nice, tight miters, and the spline jig ensure consistent spline slots.

Insert jig photos

The finish is pre cat lacquer, which I sprayed with my HVLP (earlex 5500). It was my first time using lacquer, and I really like how easy it was to lay out a nice finish. I used Marcs technique from part 2 of his mirror video.

I normally spray water Bourne poly, but lacquer was easier to achieve a good finish with. The finish here is right off the gun. What I don't like is the solvent clean up of lacquer. It's a pain having to clean the gun with thinner, and then having to store the used solvent until a hazardous waste day. I much prefer the clean up of water based poly, where the gun can be washed and then clean water run through the system.

Regardless, I am happy with the way that the frames turne out - enjoy!

post-6372-0-03864900-1431554006_thumb.jp

post-6372-0-55370100-1431554030_thumb.jp

post-6372-0-58554700-1431554049_thumb.jp

post-6372-0-83214400-1431554071_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck of a job Pug. Nice tight joints. Did you do the matting as well?

Afraid the matts came from a photo store, I just plopped them in! I looked at cutting my own matts a while ago, but it didn't seem a good investment in the tooling required. I bought the matts for about 7 dollars each, and my local glazier cut the 3mm glass for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Execution is first rate – nice tight miters and splines... The Cherry and Walnut are a good combination – the Cherry will darken and the Walnut will lighten.  In a year or two, the combination will be subtle...

 

A thought on aesthetics.... For the next frame, get yourself some straight bastard-grain stock and run the face and edge grain around frame... The effect is subtle, avoids distracting cathedraling and maintains viewer focus on the item being framed...

 

Some mechanics: rip an edge from a straight-grained flat-sawn stick. If the stick is long enough, you can get the entire frame from a single rip. If careful with your miters, you can run the grain around the frame with a near-perfect match at each miter...

 

Shooting lacquer with the Earlex is a good choice... For a picture frame, I’d have gone straight nitrocellulose lacquer or shellac --- even easier to shoot, lays-down more smoothly, etc. With a 2-stage, you’ll have a much better off-the-gun experience with shellac and/or solvent nitrocellulose lacquer over pre-cat, cat, etc.

 

Yea, solvent cleanup is a b*tch... To deal with the solvents, I switched to a consumable setup (PPS) several years ago – it’s a night-day difference... The initial cost is around $400, but my use of solvents has declined by at least 80%... I used to go through 10-15gals/month of just cleanup solvent --- since I converted to a consumables setup, I’ve been on the same 5gal can for going-on two years... It’s not as clean as the advertising videos convey, but its way cleaner than not using a consumables setup...

 

Anyway, nice job -- those miters are better than my typical result...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Execution is first rate – nice tight miters and splines... The Cherry and Walnut are a good combination – the Cherry will darken and the Walnut will lighten.  In a year or two, the combination will be subtle...

 

A thought on aesthetics.... For the next frame, get yourself some straight bastard-grain stock and run the face and edge grain around frame... The effect is subtle, avoids distracting cathedraling and maintains viewer focus on the item being framed...

 

Some mechanics: rip an edge from a straight-grained flat-sawn stick. If the stick is long enough, you can get the entire frame from a single rip. If careful with your miters, you can run the grain around the frame with a near-perfect match at each miter...

 

Shooting lacquer with the Earlex is a good choice... For a picture frame, I’d have gone straight NSL or shellac --- even easier to shoot, lays-down more smoothly, etc. With a 2-stage, you’ll have a much better off-the-gun experience with shellac and/or NSL over pre-cat, cat, etc.

 

Yea, solvent cleanup is a b*tch... To deal with the solvents, I switched to a consumable setup (PPS) several years ago – it’s a night-day difference... The initial cost is around $400, but my use of solvents has declined by at least 80%... I used to go through 10-15gals/month of just cleanup solvent --- since I converted to a consumables setup, I’ve been on the same 5gal can for going-on two years... It’s not as clean as the advertising videos convey, but its way cleaner than not using a consumables setup...

 

Anyway, nice job -- those miters are better than my typical result...

Thanks for the comments!

I agree about the grain match. I left making these frames too late, and then had to use what i had on hand. What I had for walnut and cherry were two sections (one each) about 6" wide and 22" long. I didn't have much choice in the grain selection, and would have preferred to do as you said (grain wrap). Thanks for the detailed method!

As for the finish, I think I will go back to water based poly (general hp) after I use up this lacquer. For a small time guy like me, it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense having to do so much toxic solvent clean up. I'll use this up (only 6 month shelf life), and maybe go back to it sometime in the future if I feel the need. I was happy to have the experience using it though. I may try spraying shellac through the hvlp next and see what kind of results I can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

==>I may try spraying shellac through the hvlp next and see what kind of results I can get

If it's a low-abuse item, a #1.5ct is a great finish -- easy to spray, un-matched clarity, etc... Check-out shellac.net...

 

If you're sticking w/ a 2/3-stage, I'd really step-away from WB... You can shoot it, but you need more PSI (read as 10+) to get an off-the-gun finish... For the hobbyist, the “let’s-go-green” is really a bunch of crap. If you only use a gal or two of shellac and/or 275 lacquer per year, there’s not a lot of VOC in play... Plus you get a better shelf life (infinite w/ solvent nitrocellulose lacquer) and a much better level of finish with 2/3 stage --- for a lot less money...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, should have been clear -- solvent-based nitrocellulose lacquer -- I'll go back and fix it...  You can get it old school (except in California), low-VOC 550 and ultra-low VOC 275...

 

 

 

Apart from "Sneak up on it", CN's other favorite is, "Deft makes wood look good"...

 

 

I’m not sure if the video is on his free site or behind his paywall, but it’s a must see for those trying to get to the next level... Think it’s called, “Finish Fixes”.... It’s one of the ultimate ‘save butt’ techniques... I’ve used it myself more than I’d care to admit... Say you shoot a finish and something goes wrong – not terribly wrong, but just it doesn’t come-off – no Wow!  Maybe the humidity is slightly too high, maybe the gun isn’t as clean as it should be, maybe a bad batch, whatever... Doesn’t matter, it happens --- even to those with loads of experience --- maybe the finish-Gods just didn’t smile...  What do you do? Well, if you have the time, you sand-back, clean the gun, get a new batch of finish and wait for 72F/35RH to shoot it again... The “I’m out of time” answer is to lightly scuff-sand and shoot a light-to-medium coat of Deft – it’ll burn-in to the underlying finish and lay-down like glass... You go from "dud" to "wow" in about 15 minutes... The downside, of course, is that nitrocellulose lacquer doesn’t offer much protection -- but many pieces don't really need that much protection...

 

 

BTW... Don’t mean to slag the green-guys -- where it makes a diference, going green is good... But have you noticed that there aren’t as many “WB is just as good as Traditional Finish” articles being published these days? Notice you don't see too many of the editors in FWW using WB on their projects anymore? Ever wonder why? Well there is trouble coming to paradise in the form of several lawsuits seeking class status... Won't happen because everyone is so invested in WB, but still... Turns-out that current-gen consumer-market WB finishes aren’t quite the panacea that the coating manufacturers would have everyone believe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.